The review checklist that the Committee of Judges use
to provide feedback on the articles:
|
Evaluation Criteria |
Comments to the author(s) |
|
Originality |
|
|
Does the
paper address a new problem or one that has not been studied in depth? Does the
paper present new approaches? Does it
point out differences from related research? Does it
contribute to the field? |
|
|
Research methodology |
|
|
Are the
research axes or/and aims clearly described? Are the
sample and procedure clearly described? |
|
|
Findings and data
analysis |
|
|
Is the
proper statistics or qualitative analysis used? Are the
results described and evaluated? |
|
|
Quality and clarity |
|
|
Is the
paper well written? Does the
paper motivate the research? Do
conclusions connect with aims and findings? Does the
paper carefully evaluate the strengths and limitations of its contributions? |
|
|
References |
|
|
Are the
references relevant to the topic? Is the
literature up to date? |
|
|
Technical issues |
|
|
Is the
paper organized in a logical fashion? Is the
paper written in clear English? |
|
|
RECOMMENDATION |
|
|
PUBLISH |
|
|
PUBLISH WITH MINOR
REVISIONS |
|
|
PUBLISH WITH MAJOR REVISIONS |
|
|
REJECT |
|
You may
add any further comments, advice or explanations on a separate sheet.
You can also
write on the body of the paper and send it back to us.
© Copyright-VIPAPHARM. All rights reserved