The review
checklist that the Committee of Judges use to provide feedback on the articles:
|
Evaluation Criteria |
Comments to the author(s) |
|
Originality |
|
|
Does the paper address a new problem or one that has not been studied
in depth? Does the paper present new approaches? Does it point out differences from related research? Does it contribute to the field? |
|
|
Research methodology |
|
|
Are the research axes or/and aims clearly described? Are the sample and procedure clearly described? |
|
|
Findings and data analysis |
|
|
Is the proper statistics or qualitative analysis used? Are the results described and evaluated? |
|
|
Quality and clarity |
|
|
Is the paper well written? Does the paper motivate the research? Do conclusions connect with aims and findings? Does the paper carefully evaluate the strengths and limitations of its
contributions? |
|
|
References |
|
|
Are the references relevant to the topic? Is the literature up to date? |
|
|
Technical issues |
|
|
Is the paper organized in a logical fashion? Is the paper written in clear English? |
|
|
RECOMMENDATION |
|
|
PUBLISH |
|
|
PUBLISH WITH MINOR REVISIONS |
|
|
PUBLISH WITH MAJOR REVISIONS |
|
|
REJECT |
|
You may add any further comments,
advice or explanations on a separate sheet.
You can also write on the body of the
paper and send it back to us.
© Copyright-VIPAPHARM. All rights reserved